Meeting of the ARIN Advisory Council - 25 January 2013 [Archived]

Herndon, VA

Advisory Council Attendees:

• John Sweeting, Chair (JS)
• Dan Alexander, Vice Chair (DA)
• Cathy Aronson (CA)
• Kevin Blumberg (KB)
• Bill Darte (BD)
• Owen DeLong (OD)
• David Farmer (DF)
• Chris Grundemann (CG)
• Stacy Hughes (SH)
• Scott Leibrand (SL)
• Bill Sandiford (BS)
• Heather Schiller (HS)
• Rob Seastrom (RS)
• John Springer (JS)

Minute Taker

• Thérèse Colosi

ARIN Staff:

• Michael Abejuela, Assoc. General Counsel (MA)
• Einar Bohlin, Sr. Policy Analyst (EB)
• John Curran, President & CEO
• Nate Davis, COO (ND)
• Leslie Nobile, Director of RSD (LN)

ARIN Board Observer

• Paul Andersen

ARIN General Counsel

• Steve Ryan, Esq.

Regrets:

• Milton Mueller (MM)

1. Welcome

The Chair called the meeting to order at 12:48 p.m. EST. The presence of quorum was noted. The Chair acknowledged SH had joined via teleconference, and that MM had sent his regrets due to a conflict.

2. Agenda Review

The Chair called for comments. SL requested that the AC review the revised Policy Development Process (PDP) at this time, before addressing any of the policies on the agenda. The Chair agreed and reviewed the nuances of the revised PDP with the AC.

3. Approval of the Minutes

It was moved by CG, and seconded by BD, that:

“The ARIN Advisory Council approves the Minutes of 20 December 2012, as written.”

The Chair called for comments. There were no comments.

The motion carried with no objections.

4. Draft Policy ARIN-2012-2: IPv6 Subsequent Allocations Utilization Requirement

HS stated that no text changes had occurred and the AC’s input was requested. CA volunteered to assist. The Chair reminded them that they needed to submit the text for staff and legal review by 04 March.

It was suggested this DP be discussed at the Public Policy Consultation (PPC) during the upcoming NANOG meeting.

5. Draft Policy ARIN-2012-6: Revising Section 4.4 C/I Reserved Pool Size

It was moved by BS and seconded by CA, that:

“The ARIN Advisory Council, based on comments from stakeholders expressed either at the ARIN XXX Public Policy Meeting, or on the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List, having reviewed the comments collected during the Last Call period, and noting that the Policy Development Process has been followed, supports Draft Policy 2012-6: Revising Section 4.4 C/I Reserved Pool Size and recommends the ARIN Board of Trustees adopt it.”

The Chair called for comments. There were no comments.

The motion carried unanimously via roll call.

6. Draft Policy ARIN-2012-8: Aligning 8.2 and 8.3 Transfer Policy

It was moved by CG, and seconded by BD, that:

“The ARIN Advisory Council, based on comments from stakeholders expressed either at the ARIN XXX Public Policy Meeting, or on the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List, having reviewed the comments collected during the Last Call period, and noting that the Policy Development Process has been followed, supports Draft Policy 2012-8: Aligning 8.2 and 8.3 Transfer Policy and recommends the ARIN Board of Trustees adopt it.”

The Chair called for comments. CG stated that there were no comments during last call, and that the policy was ready to move forward.

The motion carried unanimously via roll call.

7. ARIN-Prop-182: Update Residential Customer Definition to Not Exclude Wireless as Residential Service

It was moved by SL and seconded by JS, that:

“The ARIN Advisory Council accepts the text, ‘Update Residential Customer Definition to Not Exclude Wireless as Residential Service,’ as a Draft Policy.”

The Chair called for comments. CG noted that the author had provided a problem statement, and CG had forwarded it to the AC’s list. Discussion ensued as to whether or not the statement was clear. It was the sense of the AC that the statement was unclear in some areas. The Chair called for a roll call vote.

The motion failed unanimously via roll call.

8. ARIN-Prop-183. Section 8.4 Transfer Enhancement

It was moved by SL, and seconded by CG, that:

“The ARIN Advisory Council accepts the text, ‘Section 8.4 Transfer Enhancement’, as a Draft Policy.”

The Chair called for comments. Discussion ensued regarding the problem statement of this policy. It was the sense of the AC that it was clear enough to accept onto the AC’s docket, with further revisions to be made.

The motion carried unanimously via roll call.

9. Improve Communications Group (IC) Report

The Chair stated there was no report at this time. It was determined that CG would be the lead contact for the Group.
IC Members: CG, BD, JS.

10. Any Other Business

The Chair called for any other business. There were no comments.

11. Adjournment

The Chair entertained a motion to adjourn at 1:43 p.m. EST. SH moved to adjourn, seconded by KB. The meeting adjourned with no objections.